No system is perfect from day one. Every ten years, NCG undergoes a full, independent antifragility review to stress-test the entire framework, identify what is working, what is weakening, and what needs to be strengthened or removed.
This is not a routine audit — it is a deliberate, deep examination designed to make the system stronger under pressure rather than allowing it to slowly decay.
A specially convened Meta-Jury of randomly selected citizens (larger and more experienced than regular juries) leads the review. They are given full access to all performance data, public feedback, and historical records.
The jury examines the system against plausible black-swan events, changing social conditions, technological shifts, and attempts at elite capture. They ask: “Where is the system becoming fragile? Where is it genuinely antifragile?”
Citizens and regional assemblies are invited to submit evidence, proposals, and criticisms via the National Platform. The jury must consider this input but is not bound by majority opinion — it must use the Forced Construction Rule.
The jury produces a public report with specific recommendations. Major changes require a national referendum; minor adjustments can be implemented by the relevant assemblies.
“We do not assume the system is perfect. We assume it will face unexpected shocks. The ten-year review exists so that when those shocks arrive, the system is ready — not just to survive, but to grow stronger because of them.”